Press Release

For Immediate Release

Contact:
Corey Henry
(202) 463-9789

Sept. 5, 2007

Coal-to-Liquids Coalition members detail benefits of coal-based fuels; urge more federal research and development support at House subcommittee hearing


 

Washington, D.C. – Members of the Coal-to-Liquids Coalition today detailed the numerous economic, energy and environmental benefits America stands to gain by expediting the production of clean, domestic coal-to-liquid (CTL) transportation fuels at a hearing of the House Science and Technology Subcommittee on Energy and Environment.  During the hearing, coalition members also proposed steps Congress must take in order to accelerate domestic CTL production and help industry advance development of new CTL technologies.    

 

Noting that America currently relies on imports for 65 percent of its fuel needs, Dr. Robert Freerks, director of product development for Rentech, Inc., testified that the U.S. “cannot achieve energy independence without utilization of its many diverse natural resources.”  Freerks told the subcommittee that the benefits from CTL fuels in terms of U.S. energy security, balance of payments and an associated increase in jobs “will be substantial and obvious.” 

 

Freerks detailed the Air Force’s extensive interest in using CTL fuels, highlighting the Air Force’s goal of certifying CTL fuels for use in its entire fleet of aircraft by 2011, and noted that efforts to expand CTL use in the commercial aviation sector are advancing.

 

Regarding the environmental performance of CTL fuels, Freerks testified that Rentech is committed to developing and deploying advanced technologies to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions.  He explained how the company’s plans for using captured carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery operations are designed to maximize output at near-depleted domestic oil fields. 

 

John Ward, vice president of marketing and government affairs for Headwaters Inc., testified that “fuels produced by coal-to-liquid processes are exceptionally clean when compared to today’s petroleum-derived transportation fuels,” adding that CTL fuels “contain substantially no sulfur and also exhibit lower particulate and carbon monoxide emissions” and contribute less to the formation of nitrogen oxides than petroleum derived fuels, as well as being readily biodegradable.

 

Freerks and Ward called on the subcommittee to promote domestic CTL fuel production by embracing a number of incentives designed to expedite new technology development and shield domestic CTL producers from price manipulation undertaken by foreign energy cartels for the sole purpose of undercutting a competing fuel source.  Among the provisions the subcommittee was urged to support were:

 

·         Increased funding for research and development efforts, including ways to further improve the environmental performance of CTL fuels by expanding the methods of carbon capture and storage beyond currently available opportunities;

·         Providing regulatory certainty with respect to underground carbon dioxide storage;

·         Granting the Department of Defense the authority to negotiate long-term, fixed-price CTL fuel supply contracts;

·         Establishing a “price collar” program that protects domestic CTL producers from sudden price drops; and

·         Extending the existing CTL excise tax credit, set to expire in the fall of 2009, to 2020.

 

A complete copy of Dr. Robert Freerks’ testimony is available at:
http://www.futurecoalfuels.org/documents/090407_rentech.pdf.

 

A complete copy of John Ward’s testimony is available at:
http://www.futurecoalfuels.org/documents/090407_ward.pdf.

 

Testimony from all witnesses and opening statements by subcommittee members is available at:
http://science.house.gov/publications/hearings_markups_details.aspx?NewsID=1947.

 

For more information on the Coal-to-Liquids Coalition, visit the coalition’s web site at: www.futurecoalfuels.org.

###